On this page
Is there a Splitero lawsuit?
Short answer
Two cases appear in public court records, as reported by independent reviewers in September 2026: a pending federal complaint filed in June 2026 under the federal wiretapping statute, and a 2025 California real property case that was settled and dismissed. Neither challenges the terms of Splitero's home equity investment contracts.
| Filed | Court | Type | Status (as reported) |
|---|---|---|---|
| June 12, 2026 | U.S. District Court, S.D. California (No. 3:26-cv-03549) | Single-plaintiff complaint under 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (wiretapping statute) | Pending |
| June 10, 2025 | Riverside County Superior Court, California | Civil real property complaint by two homeowners | Settled; dismissed Sept 29, 2025 |
“Splitero investigation” pages
Some law-firm pages advertise an “investigation” into whether home equity investment agreements should be regulated as loans. These are requests for potential clients, not filed lawsuits. The same legal question is being raised against several HEI providers.
Accuracy note
Court records change. Check PACER or the relevant state court docket for the latest status before relying on this summary.
How to check court records yourself
Federal cases
Search PACER (pacer.uscourts.gov) by party name; the federal case above was filed in the Southern District of California.
California state cases
Use the online case search of the county superior court, such as Riverside or San Diego.
Regulators
Check the CFPB complaint database and your state's financial regulator for complaints and actions.
Comparing your options?
Before you give up a share of your home's future value, see what a personal loan could look like for a smaller amount.
Figures checked on November 6, 2026 against Splitero's published terms, its press releases and independent sources. Splitero can change terms at any time — confirm everything in your written offer before signing.
